Searching for comprehensive information on Legislature Class 11? You're at the right spot! The subject of the legislature is a key component of the Class 11 Political Science curriculum, and we have all the resources to help you ace it. Whether you're looking for Class 11 Legislature Question Answer guides or Ch 5 Legislature Class 11 Notes, we've got everything you need for effective learning and exam preparation. The Chapter 5 Legislature in Class 11 Political Science is designed to provide you with a deep understanding of how laws are made and how our legislative system functions.

Parents and teachers, you'll find our Ch 5 Legislature Class 11 Question Answer and notes to be invaluable tools for helping students grasp this important topic. We've broken down complex legislative principles into easy-to-understand language, ensuring that everyone can follow along and grasp the subject matter. Our Class 11 Political Science Chapter 5 Legislature Question Answers are tailor-made to offer in-depth insights while being easy to understand, making your teaching or learning journey a whole lot smoother.

So, why struggle to understand the legislative branch when you can have all the information you need at your fingertips? Check out our Class 11 Legislature resources and start paving your way to academic success. Trust us, mastering the legislature chapter in Class 11 has never been this easy!

Q1. Why can the Lok Sabha control the executive more effectively than the Rajya Sabha can?

Ans: Lok Sabha exercises control over the executive more effectively than Rajya Sabha because it is a directly elected body.

The Council of Ministers is responsible to Lok Sabha and not the Rajya Sabha.

The Lok Sabha has the power to make laws, ask questions and amend the Constitution.

The Lok Sabha can remove the government by expressing no-confidence but Rajya Sabha cannot remove any

government.

Lok Sabha has crucial power in controlling the finances as it can reject money bill but Rajya Sabha cannot reject

the money bill.

Q2. Arrange the different stages of passing of a bill into a law in their correct sequence:

A resolution is passed to admit the bill for discussion.

The bill is referred to the President of India – write what happens next if she/ he does not sign it.

The bill is referred to other House and is passed.

The bill is passed in the house in which it was proposed.

The bill is read clause by clause and each is voted upon.

The bill is referred to the subcommittee – the committee makes some changes and sends it back to the house for

discussion.

The concerned minister proposes the need for a bill.

Legislative department in ministry of law, drafts a bill.

Ans: The concerned minister proposes the need for a bill.

A resolution is passed to admit the bill for discussion.

Legislative department in ministry of law, drafts a bill.

The bill is referred to the subcommittee - the committee makes some changes and sends it back to the house for

discussion.

The bill is read clause by clause and each is voted upon.

The bill is passed in the house in which it was proposed.

The bill is referred to other House and is passed.

The bill is referred to the President of India.

(Note: If the President does not sign the bill, it goes back to the Parliament for with recommendations for

reconsideration and further discussion to make some changes).

Q3. Alok thinks that a country needs an efficient government that looks after the welfare of the people. So, if we simply

elected our Prime Minister and Ministers and left to them the task of government, we will not need a legislature. Do you

agree? Give reasons for your answer.

Ans: I do not agree with Alok because leaving the whole task of government with Prime Minister and Ministers would

hamper the essence of democracy.

Such a set up would reduce the representation of people in the government. The members of the legislature who

do not represent the majority would not have the opportunity to present their point of view.

The decisions made by the cabinet would not be accountable as the ministers would not have to explain them to

the legislature. Thus, the executive would become all-powerful.

The task of the legislature also includes law making. It is a complex process that requires the opinion of all

sections of society. A legislature is required for this purpose.

Q4. Dolly and Sudha are debating about the efficiency and effectiveness of the Parliament in recent times. Dolly believed that

the decline of Indian Parliament is evident in the less time spent on debate and discussion and increase in the

disturbances of the functioning of the House and walkouts etc. Sudha contends that the fall of different governments on

the floor of Lok Sabha is a proof of its vibrancy. What other arguments can you provide to support or oppose the positions

of Dolly and Sudha?

Ans: 1. On the live telecast of proceedings of the parliament, the members fight bitterly, which create wastage of nation’s

time and fund. Some of the members who do not fulfil their duty honestly, create uproars in the house.

2. Dolly views the decline of Parliament because less time is spent in discussions and disturbances are decreased in an

unpar liamentarily methods.

3. The party leaders should restrain own party members from creating such disturbances in the proceedings.

4. The presiding officers should take effective action on these misbehaviours as well as members should be made

educated to the constructive behaviour.

Q5. A class was debating the merits of a bicameral system. The following points were made during the discussion. Read the

arguments and say if you agree or disagree with each of them, giving reasons.

Neha said that bicameral legislature does not serve any purpose.

Shama argued that experts should be nominated in the second chamber.

Tridib said that if a country is not a federation, then there is no need to have a second chamber.

Ans: The statement presented by Neha does not hold true because India is a large country, two houses are preferred to

give due representations to all the sections of the society as well as monopoly of either the chamber can be

approached as check and balance.

The president of India can nominate 12 members in the Rajya Sabha. The nominations are made from among

those persons who have made significant contributions in the field of literature, art, social services, science, etc.

Even if a country is not a federation, a need for the second chamber is there. The two houses of the national

legislature are required to give representations to all the sections of the society and to give representations to all

geographical regions or parts of the country. A bicameral legislature ensures double check on every bill and every

policy matter, thus realising the exact purpose of the legislative organ of the government.

Q6. Arif wanted to know that if ministers propose most of the important bills and if the majority party often gets the

government bills passed, what is the role of the Parliament in the law making process? What answer would you give him?

Ans: Parliament is an important component of the law making process even though most of the important bills are

proposed by ministers.

This is because the provisions of the proposed law are required to be debated and these debates can only be

conducted in parliament. Various committees comprising of members of parliament study these bills and present

their recommendations.

The opposition also participates in the framing of laws by suggesting changes and thus, it is necessary for

legislative procedure to take place in parliament.

Differences between the Rajya Sabha and the Lok Sabha over proposed bills are only resolved through joint sitting

of the two houses of parliament.

Q7. Which of the following statements you agree with the most? Give your reasons.

Legislators must be free to join any party they want.

Anti-defection law has contributed to the domination of the party leaders over the legislators.

Defection is always for selfish purposes and therefore, a legislator who wants to join another party must be

disqualified from being a minister for the next two years.

Ans: Legislators should not be free to join any party they want as this would encourage corrupt practices particularly at

the time of confidence motions. While in theory, they should be free to leave the party they do not want to be

with, there should be certain restrictions outlining the conditions under which they are allowed to join another

party.

It is incorrect that anti-defection law has led to domination of party leaders over legislators. The legislators are

allowed to defect as long as they have the support of a minimum number of members from their own party.

Defection may not be always for selfish purposes. However, a legislator who wishes to join another party must

seek re-election from his/ her constituency before being eligible for ministerial posts. A period of two years of

disqualification is therefore, appropriate in this situation.

Q8. How has the system of parliamentary committee affected the overseeing and appraisal of legislation by the Parliament?

Ans: The system of parliamentary committee has influenced the overseeing and appraisal of legislation by the

Parliament as most of decisions regarding the technical points of legislation are referred to these committees. The

Parliament rarely rejects any of the suggestions made by the committee.

There are twenty Standing Committees related to various departments that work on the issues related to budget

and its expenditure related to their respective departments. These committees also supervise the bills related to

their department that come in the house. The Joint Parliamentary Committees investigate financial irregularities.

Thus, parliamentary committees have reduced the burden on the legislature and saved time as the Parliament

meets only for a limited time during its sessions. However, on most occasions, the Parliament makes only minor

alterations to the draft of the bills while approving them. This has diluted the Parliament’s appraisal of legislations

to a large extent.

Q9. The following are some proposals for making the Parliament more effective. State if you agree or disagree with each of

them and give your reasons. Explain what would be the effect if these suggestions were accepted.

1. Parliament should work for longer period.

2. Attendance should be made compulsory for members of Parliament.

3. Speakers should be empowered to penalise members for interrupting the proceedings of the House.

Ans: 1. Yes, the Parliament should work for longer period:

The parliament is supposed to ensure a responsible government but in the absence of proper time as well as boycott of

sessions and oppositions delay the important bills also remain pending for longer period. Hence, the parliament should

work for some longer duration to control the executives through debate, discussions and censures to avoid pendency of

bills.

2. Yes, the attendance should be made compulsory for members of Parliament:

The proceedings of the house get suspended due to lack of quorum.

Money bills delays for a longer period.

It shows an injustice towards the people who have elected them and whatever the constituencies are being

represented by them.

3. Yes, the speakers should be empowered to penalise members for interrupting the proceedings of the house

because:

A speaker of Lok Sabha is a presiding officer to regulate the business of the House.

Nowadays, some members create noisy uproars and disturb the proceedings of the house.

Sometimes, members create so much discomfort to compel the speaker to adjourn the house.

The precious time of the house is wasted and not utilised in the constructive debates.

Q10. Rather than effective control of the executive, the Lok Sabha is a platform for the expression of popular sentiments and

people’s expectations. Do you agree? Give reasons.

Ans: I do not agree with the statement that the Lok Sabha is only a platform for the expression of popular sentiments

and people’s expectations.

The members of the legislature are free to express their views and no action can be taken against any member for

anything said inside the house.

The main purpose of this parliamentary privilege is to enable the members to work for the people effectively as

well as control the executive.

While the Lok Sabha does provide an opportunity for elected representatives to express the expectations of their

constituents, its powers are much more wide ranging.

The Lok Sabha holds the Union Cabinet accountable for its decisions. It has the power to make laws, control

finances and amend the Constitution.

The Council of Ministers continues in office only as long as it enjoys the confidence of the Lok Sabha.

Therefore, Lok Sabha functions as an effective control of the executive.

Top of Form